Last week I started my look at
the defensive side of the ball by breaking down the top interior defensive
linemen. Now I will look at the middle of the defense on the next two levels of
the field. I decided to combine safeties and inside linebackers into one post
for a couple of reasons. First, there are a few players this year who straddle
the definitions between the two positions. Second, this class is utterly bereft
at the safety position, and it wouldn’t have made any sense to put them on
their own.
Eric Kendricks – LB UCLA
Kendricks may
not be a prototypical, traditional linebacker, but he is the perfect player to
man this position in the modern NFL. A bit undersized at 6’0” and 232 pounds,
he makes up for his shortcomings with blazing speed and fluidity. He is
everywhere on the field on every play, covering ground from sideline to
sideline and on all levels of the defense. He is at his best playing in space,
where his athleticism makes him more than a match for any ball carrier that
comes his way.
When most people think of
linebackers, they still picture a big, physical force whose first job is to
stuff the running game. But over the past decade the position has evolved,
bringing in quicker athletes who excel in pass coverage rather than in run
defense. Kendricks is another of such player. He has the athleticism to turn
his hips and run stride for stride with just about any receiver in man
coverage, and he takes deep, aggressive drops when asked to play zone. He is
incredibly smart at reading the offensive play, recognizing routes and often
beating receivers to the intended destination.
Kendricks’s strength is against
the pass, but he is hardly a liability against the run. Always around the
football, he covers a lot of ground to cut off perimeter attacks and shoots
hard upfield when a run comes towards him, knifing between blockers and finding
the ball carrier in traffic. He can sometimes be a little hesitant on his
reads, and he needs to do a better job keeping his legs driving through
contact. He is very adept at avoiding blocks, but once he’s engaged he
struggles to break free.
These issues will lead to
Kendricks falling some in the draft, along with a lack of value placed on his
position. But there is no doubt in my mind that he is the most talented and
most rounded linebacker in this draft. He is a three down player in the NFL who
can start right away, and anyone who has a chance to grab him in the middle of
the first round should leap at the opportunity.
Landon Collins – S
Alabama
If you’re a team looking to grab
a safety at the top of this year’s draft, Collins is pretty much your only
option. The cupboard is bare this year, and for that reason a team will likely
be forced to reach for a merely great prospect. Collins does some things well,
particularly as an in the box safety. He is big, roughly the same size as
several of the top linebackers, and he has above average straightline speed.
But anything earlier than twenty would be a reach for him.
Collins is at his best against
the run, particularly runs to the perimeter. He takes fantastic angles and
attacks downhill, often making plays in the backfield before the runner can get
turned upfield. He isn’t as effective between the tackles, where he can get
lost in the wash of blockers, but he is still capable of bouncing down into the
box and playing as an extra linebacker if necessary.
As an athlete Collins boasts
plenty of speed to go along with his size but falls short when it comes to
lateral quickness. He doesn’t change direction particularly well, and his make
up speed leaves a lot to be desired. It doesn’t help that he has a bad habit of
biting on fakes, taking him out of position so he has to hurry to make up the
ground he’s wasted.
As a cover guy he is best in zone
where he doesn’t have to track the sharp cuts of receivers. He can cover a lot
of ground from side to side, and he plays the ball well at the point of the
catch. He is physical without being dangerous, and he likely won’t attract a
high number of penalties in the NFL. The issue will again be how he reads the
opposing offense, something that can hopefully be corrected with practice.
Collins can be a very good,
potentially Pro Bowl level player if he polishes his game up a little. He’d be
best suited on a team that lets him freelance some in the box, someone who will
use him as Arizona
used Deone Buchannon last season. He will always have some limitations, but
this year he’s as good as you’re going to find at the safety position.
Shaq Thompson – LB/S, Washington
There really isn’t another player
in this draft like Thompson, and I’m not sure if that’s a good or a bad thing.
Popular opinion seems to have settled on him as a linebacker, but there are
still some out there who believe he would best contribute as a safety, and even
a few holdouts who think he can play running back in the NFL. He is that kind
of rare athlete, fast and fluid with almost immeasurable potential.
In many ways Thompson can be
looked at as a more athletic but less polished version of Kendricks. His
strength is in coverage, possessing the speed and quickness to shadow receivers
across the middle of the field. His skills in man to man are better than in
zone, where he lacks Kendricks’s route recognition and instinctiveness with his
drops. This is part of the reason why he wouldn’t be as successful at safety,
where he would spend more time stuck trying to read plays from zone rather than
using his athleticism to track receivers one on one.
Like Kendricks, Thompson can be
incredibly dangerous against the run, shooting through blockers with aggression
and speed other linebackers simply don’t possess. But these flashes are less
frequent than the higher ranking linebacker, and he spends a lot more time
caught up in the wash of blockers. He needs to get bigger and stronger at the
next level if he is going to be even an average run defender.
Thompson’s career will be defined
by his coaching. Anyone who tries to plug him into a traditional linebacker
role will likely just waste the skills he alredy possesses trying to develop
those he never will. More creative coaches will use him in multiple ways,
moving him all over the defense and letting his athleticism shine as his
knowledge of the game develops. He can spend time controlling the edge and
chasing runners down from behind. He can bring pass rush as a blitzer up the
middle. He can line up man to man across from receivers and tight ends in the
slot. The potential here makes Thompson worthy of a first round pick, even
though the risk for a bust is higher than just about any other player in the
draft.
Benardrick McKinney – LB, Mississippi State
Here at last we have a
traditional inside linebacker, big and strong and dedicated to stuffing the
run. Standing 6’4” and weighing 246 pounds, McKinney towers over every other linebacker
likely to go at the top of the draft. He combines this with phenomenal workout
numbers, running a 4.66 forty and a mind blowing vertical leap of 40.5 inches. There
is a lot to like about McKinney
long term, even if he needs quite a bit of work to harness his potential.
McKinney is at his best when the play comes
right at him. He meets blockers in the hole and knocks them backwards, often
enough to disrupt the play itself. He needs to do a better job shedding these
blockers to make a tackle, but when he has a clear lane downhill to the ball
carrier, he stops him dead in his tracks. Where the other top linebackers dance
through blockers with grace and agility, McKinney
bowls through them like a heat seeking missile.
He has more trouble when he’s
asked to move side to side. He doesn’t do a great job fighting laterally
through blockers, and he usually retreats in order to scrape over the top of
the wash. Out in space he has issues tackling, sometimes forgetting to use his
arms and instead going for a knockout blow. He won’t be making many tackles at
the sidelines, and faster running backs will be able to outrace him to the edge
on a consistent basis.
In a league that has embraced the
passing game like the NFL has, a player like McKinney has lost a great deal of the value
he would have had a decade ago. He is useless in pass coverage and will likely
have to come off the field in third down situations. He is probably the best
blitzing interior linebacker in this draft, but he isn’t good enough to play
consistently on the edge. His ability against the run makes him worthy of a
second round pick, and I think it’s a reasonable toss up between him and the
next player on this list.
Denzel Perryman – LB, Miami
Another smaller, quicker
linebacker of the same mold as Kendricks and Thompson, Perryman is a talented
linebacker who is a step behind the other two in every aspect of the game. He
is coming off of a productive career at Miami,
but his lack of size and merely average athleticism will give him issues transitioning
to the next level.
Perryman has fantastic closing
speed, but he struggles to harness it in a productive way. He is very hesitant
with his reads, hanging back at his initial depth until the play has already
developed. This leaves him a step behind and often eliminates any angles he might
have to make a play at or behind the line of scrimmage. When he does shoot
downhill he can be a devastating run defender, but he also has a habit of
playing out of control, racing past the ballcarrier and missing tackles. These
are minor things that can be cleaned up with coaching at the next level, but he
will take more time to develop than the other top linebackers.
Where he really falls short of
Kendricks and Thompson is in pass coverage. His straightline speed can come
close to matching theirs, but he doesn’t have anywhere near the fluidity in his
athleticism. His zone drops are awkward and shallow, and he struggles to change
direction to keep up with receivers as they run their routes. This lack of
fluidity hurts him when he attempts to make tackles in space, and even though
he does a good job wrapping with his arms he is vulnerable to quick, change of
direction runners.
Perryman does some things well,
which is why he is still probably worth a second round pick. He offers decent
positional versatility, with experience bouncing to the outside and playing as
an edge rusher. He meets blockers in the hole well, and if he can add weight he
can be a more traditional run stuffer than Kendricks or Thompson will ever be.
Down the road he can be a capable starter, but he doesn’t offer much in the way
of immediate impact or long term upside.
Paul Dawson – LB, TCU
The presence of Dawson in this draft is almost like a rule of
nature. In a year with linebackers as phenomenally fluid and athletic as
Kendricks and Thompson, there needs to be someone on the other end of the
spectrum to balance them out. Dawson
is a dreadful athlete, with a combine performance so terrible that he felt the
need to go on Twitter to defend himself. The
best forty he was able to run was 4.93, and the highest vertical leap he could manage
was 28 inches. Add that to a small stature and poor quickness and you’re
looking at a player who is seriously straining the bounds of minimum
athleticism necessary to make a career in the NFL.
There has been a lot of blowback
following Dawson’s
combine from those who believe these sort of tests have no merit whatsoever.
They point to Dawson’s
film to defend him, claiming it should bear more value than simple tests of
athleticism. And while I agree that his film shows a quality college player, it
also reveals flaws that were reinforced by his failure at the combine.
Dawson is a very instinctive player who makes
quick reads and attacks aggressively downhill. He makes more plays in the
backfield than any of the other top linebackers, though many are just cleanups
after his teammates disrupt the play. He does a good job scraping through
traffic, and he doesn’t let blockers control him after the initial engagement.
He is as polished as any
linebacker in the draft, but there are still concerns about his athleticism. He
doesn’t have the ability to make up ground if he makes a mistake with his
reads, and his aggression opens a lot of running lanes a more conservative
player wouldn’t allow. His only real hope of staying with a receiver in
coverage is to grab him, and his lack of athleticism will always hold him back
in this area. Blockers knock him backwards upon initial contact, and quick
running backs can make him miss tackles even when he has good technique.
It is very possible that Dawson will be able to
overcome his shortcomings and become a quality NFL starter, the sort of player
who will give anecdotal ammunition to the segment of people who despise the
combine. But it’s also possible that his lack of athleticism will prevent him
from ever seeing the field. The upside for Dawson is minimal, and even his success in
college would not convince me to spend more than a third round pick on him.
Gerod Holliman – S, Louisville
What do you do with a player who
is absolutely dominant in one facet of the game and absolutely wretched in
another? Do you invest in him, hoping he can provide enough value in the first
area while he develops in the second? Or do you avoid him, knowing that no
matter what he does he’ll always be a liability? This is the question teams
have to answer with Holliman, one of the more intriguing prospects in the
entire draft class.
Holliman is the best coverage
safety available in the draft. Last season he tied the NCAA single season
record with 14 interceptions, and after watching him play it seems surprising
that he didn’t have more. He is brilliant at playing the ball in the air, and
he has incredibly soft hands. He makes sharp breaks on the ball, and he does a
very good job reading routes to undercut the receivers. He can play zone at any
level of the field, but his greatest value comes sitting back over the top. His
speed isn’t anything spectacular, but he breaks early and can cover a lot of
ground side to side.
Holliman is so good at coverage
that even if he was slightly below average in every other facet of the game, he
would still likely be a first round pick. The problem is, he isn’t even close
to below average when it comes to tackling. It is almost comical watching him
try to bring ball carriers down. Every way it’s possible to miss a tackle, he
manages to do it. Overpowered, juked, taking poor angles, dragged three or four
yards before his teammates close in. It may sound like I’m exaggerating, but I
am not. I have never seen a football player at this high a level who is this
bad at tackling (excluding some, but not all, kickers and punters). The fact
that he managed to get playing time at Louisville
despite being this wretched at tackling is a testament to just how good he is
in coverage.
So what do you do? There are some
things you can say in Holliman’s defense. Very few of his missed tackles come
due to poor effort. He is a smart player, makes excellent reads (besides biting
on the occasional fake), and there is something to be said for at least being
in position for as many tackles as he misses. Given time to grow stronger and
practice his technique, he might become serviceable as an NFL tackler. If that
ever happens, he would become one of the top safeties in the league. If it
doesn’t, then he can’t even contribute on special teams. High risk and high
reward, the sort of player I think would be worth going in the third round at
the highest.
No comments:
Post a Comment