Very often when we think of
injuries we only consider what the absence of that player means in terms of the
absence of their talent. It makes sense that installing a lesser player into
that position would hinder a team’s performances. But we often overlook the
changes that need made in a team’s scheme with the loss of the player, as well
as the changes by the opposition.
In this piece I’ll go
through
several teams that have lost key offensive pieces at different positions
and
analyze the tape to try to determine how they have tried to compensate for their losses and how defenses have responded.
I’ll
start with the Falcons, who have suffered multiple injuries at the wide
receiver
position. From there I’ll move on to the losses the Broncos have
suffered on
their offensive line. After that, I’ll discuss on the Buccaneers and the
loss of Doug
Martin at Running Back. I’ll conclude with the most critical position,
the quarterback, and how the injury to Aaron Rodgers has changed the
Packers’ offense.
Atlanta Falcons
Losses: Julio
Jones, Roddy White
Schematically the Falcons have
done very little to adjust to the losses at the wide receiver position. They’ve
bumped Harry Douglas from his slot role to the outside, but he still runs
essentially the same patterns. Their offense is slightly more reliant on
crossing routes and curls as opposed to the deeper routes run along the
sideline by Jones and White.
Of greater impact have been the
changes in the scheme they have faced from the opposition. With both receivers
healthy last year it was almost impossible to match up with the Falcons in a
man scheme. Teams played primarily Cover-2 with the cornerbacks holding to
underneath zones. With proper timing, Matt Ryan was able to pick these zones
apart. Teams were hesitant to risk blitzes that would leave them exposed in man
coverage, such as in the play in the image below. As we see, the Cowboys have
sent six rushers at Matt Ryan. But at the bottom of the field, Julio Jones has
already beaten the man coverage and is open for a big completion down the
sideline.
The defensive schemes faced by the
Falcons have changed greatly since the injuries. Teams now play primarily Cover-1,
trusting their corners to match up man to man with Atlanta’s mediocre receivers. As shown below,
this allows them to send additional rushers without fear of a big play over the
top. In their week 8 matchup, the Cardinals sent six after Matt Ryan. They left
a safety deep and a linebacker in a zone in the middle, but the other three in
coverage matched up man to man with the receivers. Unlike before, Ryan had no
receiver he trusted to beat man coverage. He was forced to throw into a
congested area, leading to an interception by the safety.
Denver Broncos:
Losses: Ryan Clady, Dan Koppen, JD Walton, Chris Kuper
Statistically, it doesn’t appear
that the Broncos have lost anything due to injuries. Only the Lions have
surrendered fewer sacks this year, and their rushing attack is working at about
the same level as last season. But these are merely the results of the
adjustments they have made to counteract the losses they have suffered. In
reality, their offensive line play has fallen off noticeably due to the
injuries.
As one would expect with a Peyton
Manning led team, a sort of chess match has evolved between their offense and the
defenses they have faced. Because of the injuries to the Broncos’ line, teams
have begun blitzing Manning with increased frequency. Last year the Broncos
were able to handle almost any blitz thrown at them, but this year a well
coordinated rush can disrupt Manning. With this increase in blitzes has come an
increase in man coverage, and Denver
has responded by integrating a number of pick plays and crossing routes into
their offense. Defenses have responded by trying to be more physical at the
line, and the teams that have succeeded have managed to beat the Broncos. A
secondary only needs to hold up for a second or two before the blitz can disrupt
Manning.
Denver’s deep passing game has been limited
this year, but not due to Peyton Manning. His throws from sideline to sideline
make it clear his arm is still capable of making every throw. The change has
been to their scheme, the result of the injuries on their line. Last year they frequently
ran route combinations with every receiver running deep down the field, but this
year there is almost always at least one receiver running across the middle
where Manning can easily find and dump it off to him. This evolution of their
offense has been aided by changes in personnel. The addition of Wes Welker has
given them a more dangerous option in the short passing game than Brandon
Stokley, and the emergence of Julius Thomas has opened up the middle of the
field more. Knowshon Moreno has become a better receiving option, and they are
running many more screen plays than they did last year. The diversity lost by
the down the field attack has been offset by the versatility of their short
range game. At the same time, their offense would be even deadlier if they had
a healthy line they could trust to protect Manning.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers:
Losses: Doug Martin, Mike James
Doug Martin was off to a
disappointing start to the season when he tore his labrum in week 8 and was
placed on injured reserve. At that time he was averaging 3.6 yards per carry
with only one touchdown. Even so, his loss was a devastating blow to a
struggling offense. The fact that they have managed to win three straight after
losing their first eight is remarkable, and it has occurred due as much to
adjustments in scheme as improvement from the players.
Martin’s struggles at the
beginning of the season can be partially blamed on the scheme he was put into.
The Buccaneers run a heavy power game with guards pulling around on nearly
every rushing play. While Martin is capable of running with power, he is more
suited to a one cut style zone rushing attack. Often the team would try to
compromise by giving it to him on an outside run and trying to pull a lineman
all the way to the edge, usually slowing the play and allowing the defense to
disrupt it. With the powerful backs that came into replace Martin they had to make no such
compromise. Most of their runs now take place between the tackles, leaving
short, efficient pulls for their guards. They have also integrated a
fullback into their offense. After using one for less than a quarter of their
plays earlier this year, there is now a fullback on
the field on more than half of their offensive snaps. This has only aided them
in their efforts to jam the ball down the middle of the field. Defenses have
made few adjustments to this new style. They have actually backed off some from
the line, giving the Buccaneers looks at six man fronts they never saw with
Martin in the backfield. This has also contributed to the uptick in their
running game.
One notable way in which Tampa Bay
has been hurt by the injury is their play action game. Early in the season they
faced quite a few looks like the one displayed below, wide open receivers
running through the gap left by the linebackers who were slow to drop. Better
quarterback play would discourage this, but even the combo of Josh Freeman and
Mike Glennon could take advantage of these aggressive responses.
The Buccaneers’ run game has
improved since the injury, but does that mean that Martin isn’t as good as
their other running backs? In one simple, clear word: No. Doug Martin is an
incredibly gifted running back, and their running game will be at its best if
they can mold their system around him. Good coaches know how to get the best out of
the players they are given. We also cannot ignore the improvements made by
their offensive line over the past few weeks. They deserve as much credit for
the turnaround as anyone.
Green Bay Packers
Losses: Aaron Rodgers, Seneca Wallace
The quarterback is the most
irreplaceable player in the game, so it’s not surprising that a loss at that
position results in the most drastic change in scheme. We have witnessed a
particularly strong example of the importance of the quarterback this year,
with Green Bay
losing one of the best passers in the game. With Aaron Rodgers they are among
the best teams in the league, but without him they are among the worst. Beyond
the loss of his remarkable skillset, what has changed to send them into an
0-4-1 tailspin in games without him?
Without Aaron Rodgers
the Packers
have transitioned to a run heavy team. While the addition of Eddie Lacy
makes
this a more tenable option than in past years, the run game is still
clearly not the strength of their
attack. The success they had early on was largely a result of the
schemes set
in place against them. With Rodgers at quarterback they faced defensive
fronts
with six, and occasionally even five, defenders in the box, even in
short
yardage and red zone situations. Rodgers was smart enough to recognize
these
situations and to check to a running play when it was advantageous. If
they had
a running play called and the defense was lined up to stop it, he would
flip
the ball out on a quick screen to a wide receiver. They rarely ran the
ball into a defense set up to stop them. The same cannot be said of
their new
offense. Lacy now runs into boxes containing seven or eight men, and
they haven't given their new quarterbacks the same freedom to throw
quick screens. Since Rodgers went out,
Lacy’s yards per carry have fallen by nearly a full yard.
As you would imagine,
the changes
are even more drastic in the passing game. The Packers’ pass offense is
built
on a series of precise timing routes. Without Rodgers under center,
those have
disappeared from their gameplan. They no longer even attempt back
shoulder
throws, and they rarely send receivers out solely to block for the swing
route behind them. They have also greatly simplified the reads they ask
their
quarterback to make. Rodgers usually had five receivers to choose from,
but
with Tolzien and Flynn under center they usually keep two extra men in
the
backfield to block in order to prevent them from having to handle five
separate
options.
The notable
difference in defensive schemes comes as a result of the loss of Rodgers’s mobility. Because of his ability to
exploit a defense by moving out of the pocket or taking off downfield, defenses
were forced to play much more zone than they would have liked. Even while
blitzing, defenses remained stuck in sparse zone coverages. Now that Rodgers is
out, teams are able to man up against the Packers receivers without worrying
that the quarterback will take off while their backs are turned. With good
corner play and a strong pass rush, teams can now shut down the Packers passing
attack. When Rodgers was at quarterback, there was often nothing a defense
could do.